Enforcement of contribution norms in public good games with heterogeneous populations
نویسندگان
چکیده
Enforcement of Contribution Norms in Public Good Games with Heterogeneous Populations Economic and social interaction takes place between individuals with heterogeneous characteristics. We investigate experimentally the emergence and informal enforcement of different contribution norms to a public good in homogeneous and different heterogeneous groups. When punishment is not allowed all groups converge towards free-riding. With punishment, contributions increase and differ distinctly across groups and individuals with different induced characteristics. We show econometrically that these differences are not accidental but enforced by punishment. The enforced contribution norms are related to fairness ideas of equity regarding contribution possibilities but not regarding earnings. Individuals with different characteristics tacitly agree on the norm to be enforced, even if this leads to large payoff differences. Our results also emphasize the role of details of the environment that may alter focal contribution norms in an important way. JEL Classification: H41, C92, Z13
منابع مشابه
Coordination Problems and Norms in Heterogeneous Populations
We study coordination frictions, and the importance of contribution norms, in step-level public good games with large equilibrium sets and heterogeneous agents. We show that heterogeneity creates frictions on aggregate. An elicitation task and a questionnaire show that individuals hold, and expect others to hold, well defined yet conflicting normative views of fair contribution rules related to...
متن کاملAn Evolutionary Model of Cooperation, Fairness and Altruistic Punishment in Public Good Games
We identify and explain the mechanisms that account for the emergence of fairness preferences and altruistic punishment in voluntary contribution mechanisms by combining an evolutionary perspective together with an expected utility model. We aim at filling a gap between the literature on the theory of evolution applied to cooperation and punishment, and the empirical findings from experimental ...
متن کاملAggregative Public Good Games
We exploit the aggregative structure of the public good model to provide a simple analysis of the voluntary contribution game. In contrast to the best response function approach, ours avoids the proliferation of dimensions as the number of players is increased, and can readily analyse games involving many heterogeneous players. We demonstrate the approach at work on the standard pure public eco...
متن کاملFree Riding and Ethnic Heterogeneity∗
This paper provides a new explanation for the observed differences in the levels of public good provision in heterogeneous societies compared to the homogeneous counterparts. Consider a voluntary public good provision problem where egalitarian social norms impose income redistribution between agents: rich individuals are forced to share part of their wealth with their poor relatives. However, s...
متن کاملMandatory minimum contributions, heterogeneous endowments and voluntary public-good provision
In a public-good experiment with heterogeneous endowments, we investigate if and how the contribution level as well as the previously observed fair-share rule of equal contributions relative to one’s endowment (Hofmeyr et al., 2007; Keser et al., 2014) may be influenced by minimum-contribution requirements. We consider three different schedules: FixMin, requiring the same absolute contributions...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Games and Economic Behavior
دوره 77 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2013